Cancer From Talcum Powder: Johnson U0026 Johnson Was Convicted

Even though Johnson & Johnson declares themselves innocent, there are various research studies which show that there is a connection between talcum powder for intimate hygiene and an increased risk of cancer .

Talcum powder is one of the best-known products of the Johnson & Johnson brand and this is suspected of seriously jeopardizing the health of consumers. Cancer from talcum powder ?

The company  was fined $72 million to pay the survivors of a woman who died of ovarian cancer. She apparently used this product for years.

The prosecution  accuses Johnson & Johnson of knowing the risks of the substances in the powder  but failing to inform consumers about them.

The company defends itself by arguing that there has been insufficient scientific evidence to date. A connection between talcum powder and ovarian cancer could not be confirmed.

Jackie Fox, the victim of Johnson & Johnson powder

Jackie Fox, a woman from Alabama, USA, passed away in 2015 at the age of 62 after using Johnson & Johnson baby powder and other intimate hygiene products for decades.

Jere Beasley, one of the family’s lawyers, noted in an interview with  BBC Mundo  that  the jury condemned the company on the basis of “responsibility for harmful products, negligence and conspiracy”.

Johnson & Johnson was sentenced to pay the bereaved $10 million for bodily harm and an additional $62 million for the consequential damage caused by the death of the victim.

Marvin Salter, son of the deceased, led this indictment in the St. Louis, Missuri Court of Appeal, which was formulated as part of a major petition. About 60 people were involved.

According to Salter, his mother used Johnson & Johnson talcum powder as a staple product,  and her use was as normal as brushing her teeth.

However, the group denies the allegations and is considering the next legal steps.

The group spokeswoman Carol Goodrich assures the AP press agency that the verdict speaks against the testing. It speaks ” against the decades of tried and tested safety of powder as an ingredient in cosmetics in many products “.

She also mentioned the studies conducted by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the National Institue of Cancer . These state  that the risks have not been scientifically proven.

The evidence…

They wanted to convince the jury that there was a link between the powder and an increased risk of cancer. The victim’s lawyers presented an internal report from 1999 by a medical advisor to the group as evidence.

It affirms that  “anyone who denies the dangers” of  the powder in connection with ovarian cancer should be equated with those who deny the connection between tobacco and cancer. 

Allen Smith, one of the prosecution attorneys, showed the jury a new study by Harvard University professor Daniel Carmer. His research team proved  that talc increased the risk of ovarian cancer by up to 33%.

“The corporation had known all of these studies for 30 or 40 years,” Smith confirmed to the jury.

This is why the group is being accused of being irresponsible for selling a product that is hazardous to health without warning customers.

Gene Williams, one of the company’s lawyers, argued that the relevant US government agencies had rejected the obligation to put information on the powder’s product labels.

The verdict in favor of the Fox family  is the first successful case in US history. The group is obliged to pay compensation for the damage caused by talcum powder.

There are thousands of pending powder-related lawsuits in the United States. With this precedent, numerous lawsuits could follow.

Clear cases, like Ms. Fox’s, and much other evidence, has been around for decades. Many F achorganisationen assume, however, that more scientific evidence is needed.

This evidence is needed to confirm the link between the powder and ovarian cancer.

Research: cancer from talcum powder

For example, Cancer Research, a  UK cancer research organization, assumes that the link between talc and ovarian cancer is “still uncertain”. Even if there could be a risk, it would likely be minimal.

Another UK cancer research organization  called Ovacome says the causes of the disease are still unknown.

She explains that a combination of certain genetic factors and environmental factors is likely to determine this. Not just a product like talc.

However, the jury won over the evidence presented by the Fox family lawyers. The group has responsibility.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button